Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315220›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

A Tailored Occupational Therapist-Led Vocational Intervention for People With Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sophie O'Keefe, Kathryn Radford, Amanda Farrin, Jodi Oakman, Serena Alves-Stein, Geoffrey Cloud, Jacinta Douglas, Mandy Stanley, Natasha A Lannin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie O'KeefeSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-9909
Kathryn RadfordNottingham University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-3180
Amanda FarrinInstitute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-0584
Jodi OakmanCentre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-8442
Serena Alves-SteinDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Alfred Health, Prahran, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-4438
Geoffrey CloudDepartment of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-6907
Jacinta DouglasLiving with Disability Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-6624
Mandy StanleySchool of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-5181
Natasha A LanninSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-8345
La Trobe University · AUAlfred Health · AUEdith Cowan University · AUUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResuming work after stroke is a common goal of working-age adults, yet there are few vocational rehabilitation programs designed to address the unique challenges faced following stroke. The Work intervention was developed to address these gaps.

objectiveThis paper presents a protocol that outlines the steps that will be undertaken to pilot both the intervention and trial processes for the Work trial.

methodsThe Work trial is a 2-arm, prospective, randomized, blinded-assessor study with intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 54 adults of working age who have experienced a stroke <4 months prior will be randomized 1:1 to either (1) an experimental group who will receive a 12-week early vocational intervention (Work intervention) plus usual clinical rehabilitation or (2) a control group who will receive only their usual clinical rehabilitation.

resultsOutcomes include study and intervention feasibility and intervention benefit. In addition to evaluating the feasibility of delivering vocational intervention early after stroke, benefit will be assessed by measuring rates of vocational participation and quality-of-life improvements at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Process evaluation using data collected during the study, as well as postintervention individual interviews with participants and surveys with trial therapists, will complement quantitative data.

conclusionsThe results of the trial will provide details on the feasibility of delivering the Work intervention embedded within the clinical rehabilitation context and inform future trial processes. Pilot data will enable a future definitive trial to determine the clinical effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation when delivered in the early subacute phase of stroke recovery.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001164189; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378112&isReview=true. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40548.

Indexed as

acquired brain injuryfeasibilityinterventionneurosciencerehabilitationresume workreturn to workstrokestroke recoverytraumatic brain injuryvocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36315220
PMCPMC9664318
OpenAlexW4292929008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.