Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315219›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2022

Youth Perspectives on the Recommended Age of Mobile Phone Adoption: Survey Study.

Aliah Richter, Victoria Adkins, Ellen Selkie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bedtime Screen Use Behaviors and Sleep Outcomes in Early Adolescents: A Prospective Cohort Study.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aliah RichterChild Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-0928
Victoria AdkinsChild Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8919-4224
Ellen SelkieChild Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-1013
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Implications for socio-emotional well-being from adolescent peer interaction on social mediaK23HD093815 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SELKIE, ELLEN MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$818k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD093815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing prevalence of phone ownership in early adolescence, there is a deficit of evidence-based guidance on the appropriate time to provide youth their first phone.

objectiveThis survey study explored age recommendations for phone ownership among a diverse panel of youths, as their experiences are an important contribution to the development of ownership guidelines.

methodsParticipants were recruited from MyVoice, a national panel of over 765 youth (14 to 24 years old) who respond to weekly SMS text message-based surveys. Questions were distributed between January 24 2018, and March 20, 2018. Inductive qualitative analysis was used to identify major themes among youths' open-ended responses.

resultsIn all, 469 youth (mean age 18.8 years; female: 299/469, 63.8%; White race: 332/468, 70.8%) responded. On average, respondents obtained their first phone at 12.2 years of age. Most participants (325/459, 71.1%) stated they received their first phone out of necessity rather than for entertainment or social reasons. Youth recommended that early adolescents receive their first phone between 12 and 13 years of age primarily for reasons of necessity (146/448, 32.6%).

conclusionsAccording to the participants, phones supported safety and independence by allowing communication with parents and participation in activities. Youth-serving professionals and parents can incorporate these youth perspectives into shared decision-making about phone ownership among families. This can include discussions about essential features, safety, or phone use, as well as maturity and responsibility milestones, which were all key considerations reported by participants in the survey.

Indexed as

adolescentcell phonechildmediamobile phoneparental guidanceparentingphone ownershipphone usesmartphonetechnologyyouth

Identifiers

PMID36315219
PMCPMC9664330
OpenAlexW4307839774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.