Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315142›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of Maternal Caffeine Consumption During Pregnancy With Child Growth.

Jessica L Gleason, Rajeshwari Sundaram, Susanna D Mitro, Stefanie N Hinkle, Stephen E Gilman, Cuilin Zhang, Roger B Newman, Kelly J Hunt, Daniel W Skupski, William A Grobman and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Periconceptual Caffeine Intake and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Results From the nuMoM2b Cohort.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Error in Table 1.JAMA network open · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica L GleasonEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Rajeshwari SundaramBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Susanna D MitroEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Stefanie N HinkleDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Stephen E GilmanSocial and Behavioral Sciences Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Cuilin ZhangEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Roger B NewmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Kelly J HuntDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Daniel W SkupskiWeill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Queens, New York, New York.
William A GrobmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Michael NageotteMiller Children's and Women's Hospital, Long Beach, California.
Morgan RobinsonDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Kurunthachalam KannanDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Katherine L GrantzEpidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNew York University · USCornell University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMiller Children's & Women's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Exposome Contributors to Child Health Originating from National Fetal Growth Study (ECCHO-NFGS)UG3OD023316 · OD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HUNT, KELLY J, WAPNER, RONALD · 2016 to 2017
$10.8M
NIH HHS UG3 OD023316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Greater caffeine consumption in pregnancy is associated with reduced birth size, but potential associations with childhood growth are unclear. Objective: To evaluate the associations of pregnancy caffeine and paraxanthine measures with child growth in a contemporary cohort with low caffeine consumption and a historical cohort with high caffeine consumption. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes cohort of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies (ECHO-FGS; 10 sites, 2009-2013) was a pregnancy cohort with 1 child measurement between ages 4 and 8 years (follow-up in 2017-2019). The Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP) was a pregnancy cohort (12 sites, 1959-1965) with child follow-up through 8 years (1960-1974). The current secondary analysis was conducted in 2021 and 2022. Exposures: Concentrations of caffeine and its primary metabolite, paraxanthine, were quantified from plasma (ECHO-FGS) and serum (CPP) collected in the first trimester. Cut points for analyses were defined by quartiles in ECHO-FGS and quintiles in CPP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Child z scores for body mass index, weight, and height were evaluated, as well as fat mass index and percentage and obesity risk measured at 1 time between age 4 and 8 years in ECHO-FGS. In a secondary analysis of the CPP cohort, child z scores and obesity risk longitudinally through age 8 years were evaluated. Results: In ECHO-FGS (median caffeine intake <50 mg/d), 788 children (mean [SD] age, 6.8 [1.0] years; 411 boys [52.2%]) of women in the fourth vs first quartile of plasma caffeine concentrations had lower height z scores (β = -0.21; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.02), but differences in weight z scores were only observed in the third quartile (β = -0.27; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.07). In CPP, beginning at age 4 years, 1622 children (805 boys [49.7%]) of women in the highest caffeine quintile group had lower height z scores than their peers from the lowest group, with the gap widening with each successive year of age (β = -0.16 [95% CI, -0.31 to -0.01] at 4 years; β = -0.37 [95% CI, -0.57 to -0.16] at 8 years). There were slight reductions in weight at ages 5 to 8 years for children in the third vs first caffeine quintile (β = -0.16 to -0.22). Results were consistent for paraxanthine concentrations in both cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: Intrauterine exposure to increasing levels of caffeine and paraxanthine, even in low amounts, was associated with shorter stature in early childhood. The clinical implication of reductions in height and weight is unclear; however, the reductions were apparent even with levels of caffeine consumption below clinically recommended guidelines of less than 200 mg per day.

Indexed as

CaffeineObesityBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRisk FactorsCaffeine

Identifiers

PMID36315142
PMCPMC9623443
OpenAlexW4307919287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.