Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315120›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Deep Learning-Based Modeling of the Dark Adaptation Curve for Robust Parameter Estimation.

Tharindu De Silva, Kristina Hess, Peyton Grisso, Alisa T Thavikulwat, Henry Wiley, Tiarnan D L Keenan, Emily Y Chew, Brett G Jeffrey, Catherine A Cukras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tharindu De SilvaUnit on Clinical Investigation of Retinal Disease, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kristina HessUnit on Clinical Investigation of Retinal Disease, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peyton GrissoUnit on Clinical Investigation of Retinal Disease, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alisa T ThavikulwatDivision of Epidemiology & Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Henry WileyDivision of Epidemiology & Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tiarnan D L KeenanDivision of Epidemiology & Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Emily Y ChewDivision of Epidemiology & Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brett G JeffreyOphthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Catherine A CukrasUnit on Clinical Investigation of Retinal Disease, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates deep-learning (DL) sequence modeling techniques to reliably fit dark adaptation (DA) curves and estimate their key parameters in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to improve robustness and curve predictions. Methods: A long-short-term memory autoencoder was used as the DL method to model the DA curve. The performance was compared against the classical nonlinear regression method using goodness-of-fit and repeatability metrics. Experiments were performed to predict the latter portion of the curve using data from early measurements. The prediction accuracy was quantified as the rod intercept time (RIT) prediction error between predicted and actual curves. Results: The two models had comparable goodness-of-fit measures, with root mean squared error (RMSE; SD) = 0.11 (0.04) log-units (LU) for the classical model and RMSE = 0.13 (0.06) LU for the DL model. Repeatability of the curve fits evaluated after introduction of random perturbations, and after performing repeated testing, demonstrated superiority of the DL method, especially among parameters related to cone decay. The DL method exhibited superior ability to predict the curve and RIT using points prior to -2 LU, with 3.1 ± 3.1 minutes RIT prediction error, compared to 19.1 ± 18.6 minutes RIT error for the classical method. Conclusions: The parameters obtained from the DL method demonstrated superior robustness as well as predictability of the curve. These could provide important advances in using multiple DA curve parameters to characterize AMD severity. Translational Relevance: Dark adaptation is an important functional measure in studies of AMD and curve modeling using DL methods can lead to improved clinical trial end points.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMacular DegenerationDark AdaptationHumansVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID36315120
PMCPMC9631495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.