Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314973›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Identification of Bacterial Pathogens at Genus and Species Levels through Combination of Raman Spectrometry and Deep-Learning Algorithms.

Liang Wang, Jia-Wei Tang, Fen Li, Muhammad Usman, Chang-Yu Wu, Qing-Hua Liu, Hai-Quan Kang, Wei Liu, Bing Gu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rapid discrimination between wild and cultivatedCurrent research in food science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Liang Wang *Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jia-Wei Tang *Department of Intelligent Medical Engineering, School of Medical Informatics and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Fen Li *Laboratory Medicine, The Fifth People's Hospital of Huai'an, Huai'an, Jiangsu Province, China.
Muhammad UsmanDepartment of Intelligent Medical Engineering, School of Medical Informatics and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chang-Yu WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qing-Hua LiuState Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau SAR, China.
Hai-Quan KangLaboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Intelligent Medical Engineering, School of Medical Informatics and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Bing GuLaboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xuzhou Medical College · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MOSecond People’s Hospital of Huai’an · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid and accurate identification of the causing agents during bacterial infections would greatly improve pathogen transmission, prevention, patient care, and medical treatments in clinical settings. Although many conventional and molecular methods have been proven to be efficient and reliable, some of them suffer technical biases and limitations that require the development and application of novel and advanced techniques. Recently, due to its cost affordability, noninvasiveness, and label-free feature, Raman spectroscopy (RS) is emerging as a potential technique for fast bacterial detection. However, the method is still hampered by many technical issues, such as low signal intensity, poor reproducibility, and standard data set insufficiency, among others. Thus, it should be cautiously claimed that Raman spectroscopy could provide practical applications in real-world settings. In order to evaluate the implementation potentials of Raman spectroscopy in the identification of bacterial pathogens, we investigated 30 bacterial species belonging to 9 different bacterial genera that were isolated from clinical samples via surfaced enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). A total of 17,149 SERS spectra were harvested from a Raman spectrometer and were further analyzed via machine learning approaches, which showed that a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning algorithm achieved the highest prediction accuracy for recognizing pathogenic bacteria at both the genus and species levels. In summary, the SERS technique holds a promising potential for fast bacterial pathogen identification in clinical laboratories with the integration of machine learning algorithms, which might be further developed and sharpened for the direct identification and prediction of bacterial pathogens from clinical samples.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsDeep LearningBacteriaHumansReproducibility of ResultsSpectrum Analysis, Ramanbacterial pathogenmachine learning algorithmRaman spectroscopyrapid diagnosisSERS

Identifiers

PMID36314973
PMCPMC9769533
OpenAlexW4307770829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.