Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314847›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of medicine2022

An online community peer support intervention to promote COVID-19 vaccine information among essential workers: a randomized trial.

Dominic Arjuna Ugarte, Jeremy Lin, Tianchen Qian, Sean D Young

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominic Arjuna UgarteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3984-7324
Jeremy LinDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Tianchen QianDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-7826
Sean D YoungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-4875
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Mining real-time social media big data to monitor HIV: Development and Ethical IssuesR01AI132030 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YOUNG, SEAN · 2017 to 2020
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccine hesitancy is still rampant in the United States, including health care personnel. Vaccination of frontline essential workers (e.g. health care workers) is very important, especially during a pandemic. We tested the efficacy of a 4-week online, peer-led intervention (Harnessing Online Peer Education) to promote requests for COVID-19 vaccine information among essential workers.

methodsParticipants (

resultsA total of 101 participants analysed (50 intervention and 51 control). Six people in the intervention group and 0 people in the control group requested vaccine information. Ten people in the intervention group and six people in the control group provided proof of vaccination. The odds of requesting vaccine information in the intervention group was 13 times that in the control group (95% confidence interval: (1.5, 1772),

conclusionsResults suggest peer-led online community groups may help to disseminate health information, aid public health efforts, and combat vaccine hesitancy. Key MessagesThe odds of requesting vaccine information was 13 times in the intervention group.Peer-led online communities may help to disseminate information and aid public health efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccineshelp-seeking behaviourPublic healthvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36314847
PMCPMC9629065
OpenAlexW4307890052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.