Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314777›Full record

ReviewNeurodegenerative disease management2023

Updates and advances in multiple sclerosis neurotherapeutics.

Moein Amin, Carrie M Hersh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurodegenerative disease management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Sex- and age-specific associations ofAnnals of medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moein AminCleveland Clinic, Department of Neurology, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Carrie M HershCleveland Clinic, Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5716-5645

Funding

Validation of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain as a Prognostic and Monitoring Biomarker in Multiple SclerosisU01NS111678 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESI, PETER A · 2020 to 2024
$6.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS111678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multiple sclerosis (MS) neurotherapeutic landscape is rapidly evolving. New disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with improved efficacy and safety, in addition to an expanding pipeline of agents with novel mechanisms, provide more options for patients with MS. While treatment of MS neuroinflammation is well tailored in the existing DMT armamentarium, concerted efforts are currently underway for identifying neuropathological targets and drug discovery for progressive MS. There is also ongoing research to develop agents for remyelination and neuroprotection. Further insights are needed to guide DMT initiation and sequencing as well as to determine the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsing and progressive MS. This review provides a summary of these updates.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingHumansNeuroprotectionTransplantation, Autologousautologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantationBTK inhibitorsdisease-modifying therapyearly highly effective therapyescalation therapymultiple sclerosisneuroprotective agentsprogressive multiple sclerosisrelapsing multiple sclerosisremyelinating therapies

Identifiers

PMID36314777
PMCPMC10072078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.