Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314769›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

The role of conjunctive representations in prioritizing and selecting planned actions.

Atsushi Kikumoto, Ulrich Mayr, David Badre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive Control.Annual review of psychology · 2025
    Review
  8. Semantic Anchors Facilitate Task Encoding in Continual Learning.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Task switch costs scale with dissimilarity between task rules.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Prospection of Potential Actions during Visual Working Memory Starts Early, Is Flexible, and Predicts Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Feature Integration in Motor Sequences: Implications for Abstract Task Sequence Studies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atsushi KikumotoDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-2700
Ulrich MayrDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7512-4556
David BadreDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-6241

Funding

The organization of neural representations for flexible behavior in the human brainR01MH125497 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
Mapping representational format across the human brainR21NS108380 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID · 2018 to 2019
$462k
NIH HHS S10 OD025181NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125497NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS108380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For flexible goal-directed behavior, prioritizing and selecting a specific action among multiple candidates are often important. Working memory has long been assumed to play a role in prioritization and planning, while bridging cross-temporal contingencies during action selection. However, studies of working memory have mostly focused on memory for single components of an action plan, such as a rule or a stimulus, rather than management of all of these elements during planning. Therefore, it is not known how post-encoding prioritization and selection operate on the entire profile of representations for prospective actions. Here, we assessed how such control processes unfold over action representations, highlighting the role of conjunctive representations that nonlinearly integrate task-relevant features during maintenance and prioritization of action plans. For each trial, participants prepared two independent rule-based actions simultaneously, then they were retro-cued to select one as their response. Prior to the start of the trial, one rule-based action was randomly assigned to be high priority by cueing that it was more likely to be tested. We found that both full action plans were maintained as conjunctive representations during action preparation, regardless of priority. However, during output selection, the conjunctive representation of the high-priority action plan was more enhanced and readily selected as an output. Furthermore, the strength of the high-priority conjunctive representation was associated with behavioral interference when the low-priority action was tested. Thus, multiple alternate upcoming actions were maintained as integrated representations and served as the target of post-encoding attentional selection mechanisms to prioritize and select an action from within working memory.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermCuesHumansProspective Studiesaction plansconjunctive representationsEEGhumanneuroscienceworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36314769
PMCPMC9651952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.