Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314662›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2023

Blended Survival Curves: A New Approach to Extrapolation for Time-to-Event Outcomes from Clinical Trials in Health Technology Assessment.

Zhaojing Che, Nathan Green, Gianluca Baio

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. SurvInt: a simple tool to obtain precise parametric survival extrapolations.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhaojing CheDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2245-1606
Nathan GreenDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London UK.
Gianluca BaioDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival extrapolation is essential in cost-effectiveness analysis to quantify the lifetime survival benefit associated with a new intervention, due to the restricted duration of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Current approaches of extrapolation often assume that the treatment effect observed in the trial can continue indefinitely, which is unrealistic and may have a huge impact on decisions for resource allocation.

objectiveWe introduce a novel methodology as a possible solution to alleviate the problem of survival extrapolation with heavily censored data from clinical trials.

methodThe main idea is to mix a flexible model (e.g., Cox semiparametric) to fit as well as possible the observed data and a parametric model encoding assumptions on the expected behavior of underlying long-term survival. The two are "blended" into a single survival curve that is identical with the Cox model over the range of observed times and gradually approaching the parametric model over the extrapolation period based on a weight function. The weight function regulates the way two survival curves are blended, determining how the internal and external sources contribute to the estimated survival over time.

resultsA 4-y follow-up RCT of rituximab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is used to illustrate the method.

conclusionLong-term extrapolation from immature trial data may lead to significantly different estimates with various modelling assumptions. The blending approach provides sufficient flexibility, allowing a wide range of plausible scenarios to be considered as well as the inclusion of external information, based, for example, on hard data or expert opinion. Both internal and external validity can be carefully examined. HIGHLIGHTS: Interim analyses of trials with limited follow-up are often subject to high degrees of administrative censoring, which may result in implausible long-term extrapolations using standard approaches.In this article, we present an innovative methodology based on "blending" survival curves to relax the traditional proportional hazard assumption and simultaneously incorporate external information to guide the extrapolation.The blended method provides a simple and powerful framework to allow a careful consideration of a wide range of plausible scenarios, accounting for model fit to the short-term data as well as the plausibility of long-term extrapolations.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalCost-Benefit AnalysisCyclophosphamideHumansSurvival AnalysisCyclophosphamideexpert opinion; extrapolation; real world evidencesurvival modeling in HTA

Identifiers

PMID36314662
PMCPMC10026162
OpenAlexW4307776859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read17
table measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.