ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022
Function and Constraint in Enhancer Sequences with Multiple Evolutionary Origins.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergence and evolution of protein-coding de novo genes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Novelty versus innovation of gene regulatory elements in human evolution and disease.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- Human gene regulatory evolution is driven by the divergence of regulatory element function in both cis and trans.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Phylogenetic modeling of enhancer shifts in African mole-rats reveals regulatory changes associated with tissue-specific traits.Genome research · 2023Article
- Enhancer architecture and chromatin accessibility constrain phenotypic space during Drosophila development.Developmental cell · 2023Article
- Characterization of transcriptional enhancers in the chicken genome using CRISPR-mediated activation.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Thousands of human gene regulatory enhancers are composed of sequences with multiple evolutionary origins. These evolutionarily "complex" enhancers consist of older "core" sequences and younger "derived" sequences. However, the functional relationship between the sequences of different evolutionary origins within complex enhancers is poorly understood. We evaluated the function, selective pressures, and sequence variation across core and derived components of human complex enhancers. We find that both components are older than expected from the genomic background, and complex enhancers are enriched for core and derived sequences of similar evolutionary ages. Both components show strong evidence of biochemical activity in massively parallel report assays. However, core and derived sequences have distinct transcription factor (TF)-binding preferences that are largely similar across evolutionary origins. As expected, given these signatures of function, both core and derived sequences have substantial evidence of purifying selection. Nonetheless, derived sequences exhibit weaker purifying selection than adjacent cores. Derived sequences also tolerate more common genetic variation and are enriched compared with cores for expression quantitative trait loci associated with gene expression variability in human populations. In conclusion, both core and derived sequences have strong evidence of gene regulatory function, but derived sequences have distinct constraint profiles, TF-binding preferences, and tolerance to variation compared with cores. We propose that the step-wise integration of younger derived with older core sequences has generated regulatory substrates with robust activity and the potential for functional variation. Our analyses demonstrate that synthesizing study of enhancer evolution and function can aid interpretation of regulatory sequence activity and functional variation across human populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.