Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314501›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2023

A typology of nurses' interaction with relatives in emergency situations.

Nadia Primc, Sven Schwabe, Juliane Poeck, Andreas Günther, Martina Hasseler, Giovanni Rubeis

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia PrimcInstitute of History and Ethics of Medicine, 9144University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3881-8057
Sven SchwabeInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, 9177Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Juliane PoeckInstitute of General Practice, 39065University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Andreas GüntherFire Department, 524823City of Braunschweig, Braunschweig Germany.
Martina HasselerFaculty of Health Sciences, 120199Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel Germany.
Giovanni RubeisDivision Biomedical and Public Health Ethics, 467773Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-9436
Heidelberg University · DEJena University Hospital · DEKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATKlinikum Braunschweig · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEOstfalia University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn nursing homes, residents' relatives represent important sources of support for nurses. However, in the heightened stress of emergency situations, interaction between nurses and relatives can raise ethical challenges. RESEARCH

objectivesThe present analysis aimed at elaborating a typology of nurses' experience of ethical support and challenges in their interaction with relatives in emergency situations. RESEARCH

designThirty-three semi-structured interviews and six focus groups were conducted with nurses from different nursing homes in Germany. Data were analysed according to Mayring's method of qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Participants were licensed nurses working in nursing homes. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was granted by Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences (02.07.2020) and the Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School (Nr. 8866_BO_K_2020; 27.01.2020). Interviewees were anonymised and focus group were pseudonymised during transcription. All participants provided written consent. FINDINGS/

resultsIn emergency situations, relatives can represent important sources of support for nurses. However, they may also give rise to different challenges, relating to four ethical conflicts: (1) the challenge of meeting the information needs of relatives while providing appropriate care to all residents; (2) the challenge of managing relatives' demands for hospitalisation when hospitalisation is not deemed necessary by nurses; (3) the challenge of managing relatives' demands for lifesaving treatment when such treatment contradicts the will of the resident; and (4) the challenge of attempting to initiate hospitalisation when relatives oppose this course of action. Several external factors make these conflicts especially challenging for nurses: fear of legal consequences, a low staffing ratio, and a lack of qualified nursing staff.

conclusionsConflict between nurses and relatives typically revolves around hospitalisation and the initiation of lifesaving treatment. Whether nurses perceive interaction with relatives as supportive or conflictual essentially depends on the quality of the relationship, which may be negatively influenced by a number of external factors.

Indexed as

NursesNursing StaffFocus GroupsHumansNursing HomesQualitative Researchavoidable hospital transfersemergencyethicsNursing homerelatives

Identifiers

PMID36314501
PMCPMC10014892
OpenAlexW4307777293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.