Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314152›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Imagination as a fundamental function of the hippocampus.

Alison E Comrie, Loren M Frank, Kenneth Kay

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Multisensory coding of audiovisual movies in the human hippocampus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Map's Design: Evolution's Impact on Navigation and Spatial Cognition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modelling of What-Where-When Everyday Memories in Rats.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The recursive grammar of mental time travel.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Alison E ComrieNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-4892
Loren M FrankKavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-5677
Kenneth KayZuckerman Institute, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, 3227 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-7217
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USSanford Broadway Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Hippocampal-cortical interactions supporting memory and value-guided decision-makingF31MH124366 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COMRIE, ALISON E. · 2020 to 2022
$123k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS F31 MH124366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imagination is a biological function that is vital to human experience and advanced cognition. Despite this importance, it remains unknown how imagination is realized in the brain. Substantial research focusing on the hippocampus, a brain structure traditionally linked to memory, indicates that firing patterns in spatially tuned neurons can represent previous and upcoming paths in space. This work has generally been interpreted under standard views that the hippocampus implements cognitive abilities primarily related to actual experience, whether in the past (e.g. recollection, consolidation), present (e.g. spatial mapping) or future (e.g. planning). However, relatively recent findings in rodents identify robust patterns of hippocampal firing corresponding to a variety of alternatives to actual experience, in many cases without overt reference to the past, present or future. Given these findings, and others on hippocampal contributions to human imagination, we suggest that a fundamental function of the hippocampus is to generate a wealth of hypothetical experiences and thoughts. Under this view, traditional accounts of hippocampal function in episodic memory and spatial navigation can be understood as particular applications of a more general system for imagination. This view also suggests that the hippocampus contributes to a wider range of cognitive abilities than previously thought. This article is part of the theme issue 'Thinking about possibilities: mechanisms, ontogeny, functions and phylogeny'.

Indexed as

HippocampusMemory, EpisodicHumansImaginationMental RecallNeuronshippocampusimaginationmemoryplace cellsreplaytheta

Identifiers

PMID36314152
PMCPMC9620759
OpenAlexW4307684321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.