Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314130›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Heart failure2023

In-Hospital Virtual Peer-to-Peer Consultation to Increase Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Vishal N Rao, Anand Shah, Jaime McDermott, Stephanie G Barnes, Evan M Murray, Michelle D Kelsey, Stephen J Greene, Marat Fudim, Adam D DeVore, Chetan B Patel and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evolving Decongestion Strategies in the Management of Acute Heart Failure.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vishal N RaoDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-3545-4267
Anand ShahDepartment of Medicine (A.S., E.M.M., C.O.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-9861-5369
Jaime McDermottDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4294-0570
Stephanie G BarnesDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-3952-8043
Evan M MurrayDepartment of Medicine (A.S., E.M.M., C.O.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-2629
Michelle D KelseyDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-2169-043X
Stephen J GreeneDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-6912-7374
Marat FudimDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-7007
Adam D DeVoreDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-2221
Chetan B PatelDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Michael A BlazingDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Cara O'BrienDepartment of Medicine (A.S., E.M.M., C.O.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Robert J MentzDivision of Cardiology (V.N.R., J.M., S.G.B., M.D.K., S.J.G., M.F., A.D.D., C.B.P., M.A.B., R.J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-3222-1719
Duke University · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
Congestion Phenotypes and Splanchnic Nerve Modulation in Chronic Heart FailureK23HL151744 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FUDIM, MARAT · 2021 to 2022
$376k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL151744NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Optimizing GDMT in the hospital is associated with greater long-term use in HFrEF. This study aimed to describe the efficacy of a multidisciplinary virtual HF intervention on GDMT optimization among patients with HFrEF admitted for any cause.

methodsIn this pilot randomized, controlled study, consecutive patients with HFrEF admitted to noncardiology medicine services for any cause were identified at a large academic tertiary care hospital between May to September 2021. Major exclusions were end-stage renal disease, hemodynamic instability, concurrent COVID-19 infection, and current enrollment in hospice care. Patients were randomized to a clinician-level virtual peer-to-peer consult intervention providing GDMT recommendations and information on medication costs versus usual care. Primary end points included (1) proportion of patients with new GDMT initiation or use and (2) changes to HF optimal medical therapy scores which included target dosing (range, 0-9).

resultsOf 242 patients identified, 91 (38%) were eligible and randomized to intervention (N=52) or usual care (N=39). Baseline characteristics were similar between intervention and usual care (mean age 63 versus 67 years, 23% versus 26% female, 46% versus 49% Black, mean ejection fraction 33% versus 31%). GDMT use on admission was also similar. There were greater proportions of patients with GDMT initiation or continuation with the intervention compared with usual care. After adjusting for optimal medical therapy score on admission, changes to optimal medical therapy score at discharge were higher for the intervention group compared with usual care (+0.44 versus -0.31, absolute difference +0.75, adjusted estimate 0.86±0.42;

conclusionsAmong eligible patients with HFrEF hospitalized for any cause on noncardiology services, a multidisciplinary pilot virtual HF consultation increased new GDMT initiation and dose optimization at discharge.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart FailureFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeReferral and ConsultationStroke Volumeheart failurehospitalizationpractice patterns, physicians'quality of careremote consultation

Identifiers

PMID36314130
PMCPMC9974597
OpenAlexW4307771798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.