Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314107›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Perspectives of choice and control in daily life for people following brain injury: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Carolyn M Murray, Scott Weeks, Gisela van Kessel, Michelle Guerin, Emma Watkins, Shylie Mackintosh, Caroline Fryer, Susan Hillier, Mandy Stanley

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perspectives of choice and control in daily life for people following brain injury: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Reclaiming Agency in Care Decisions and Barriers From the Perspectives of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury and Their Family Members.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carolyn M MurrayAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4471-0509
Scott WeeksAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Gisela van KesselUniversity of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Michelle GuerinAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Emma WatkinsNeuromoves, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Shylie MackintoshAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Caroline FryerAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Susan HillierAllied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mandy StanleySchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-5181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAcquired brain injury (ABI) can result in considerable life changes. Having choice and control over daily life is valued by people following ABI. This meta-synthesis will analyse and integrate international research exploring perspectives of choice and control in daily life following ABI.

methodsDatabases were searched from 1980 to 13 January 2022 for eligible qualitative studies. After duplicates were removed, 22,768 studies were screened by title and abstract, and 241 studies received full-text assessment with 56 studies included after pearling. Study characteristics and findings were extracted that related to personal perspectives on choice and control by people with an ABI (including author interpretation and quotes). Data from each study were coded and then segments of coded data across the studies were compared to create multiple broad categories.

findingsFindings were then reduced from categories into 3 overarching themes with 12 subthemes. These themes were: (1) feeling like a second-class citizen; (2) reordering life and (3) choosing a path. Participants with an ABI tussled between their feelings of loss following brain injury and their thinking about how they start to regain control and become agents of their own choices. The themes describe their sense of self, their changed self and their empowered self in relation to 'choice and control'.

conclusionsRe-engaging with choice and control after ABI is dynamic and can be challenging. Health professionals and supporters need to facilitate a gradual and negotiated return to agency for people following ABI. A sensitive and person-centred approach is needed that considers the readiness of the person with ABI to reclaim choice and control at each stage of their recovery. Clear service or process indicators that are built on lived experience research are needed to facilitate changes in service delivery that are collaborative and inclusive. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This review included the voices of 765 people living with ABI and was conducted by a diverse team of allied health professionals with practice knowledge and research experience with people following ABI. Twenty-nine of the 56 included studies had participants contributing to their design or analysis.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative Researchbehavioural sciencesbrain injuries, traumaticemotionshealth servicesrehabilitationsocial sciencesstroke

Identifiers

PMID36314107
PMCPMC9700193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.