Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314033›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Applying the behavior change wheel to design de-implementation strategies to reduce low-value statin prescription in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care.

Alvaro Sanchez, Usue Elizondo-Alzola, Jose I Pijoan, Marta M Mediavilla, Susana Pablo, Rita Sainz de Rozas, Itxasne Lekue, Susana Gonzalez-Larragan, Marta Llarena, Olatz Larrañaga and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04022850 (De-implementation of Low-value Pharmacological Prescriptions), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04022850 nacompletednot on this map

De-implementation of Low-value Pharmacological Prescriptions

TypeinterventionalSponsorBasque Health ServiceRan2022 to 2024Enrolled348ConditionsInappropriate Prescribing, Implementation Science, Behavioral SciencesArmsA non-reflective decision assistance strategy, A both reflective and non-reflective decision information strategy, A reflective decision structure strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alvaro SanchezPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Usue Elizondo-AlzolaPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Jose I PijoanClinical Epidemiology Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Marta M MediavillaPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Susana PabloPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Rita Sainz de RozasPrimary Care Pharmacy Unit, Ezkerraldea-Enkarterri-Cruces Integrated Health Organization, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Itxasne LekuePrimary Care Pharmacy Unit, Ezkerraldea-Enkarterri-Cruces Integrated Health Organization, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Susana Gonzalez-LarraganDepartment of Health Science Library, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Marta LlarenaPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Olatz LarrañagaPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.
Christian D HelfrichVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, United States.
Gonzalo GrandesPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A substantial proportion of individuals with low cardiovascular risk receive inappropriate statin prescription for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) instead of the evidence-based recommendations to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study reports on the structured process performed to design targeted de-implementation strategies to reduce inappropriate prescription of statins and to increase healthy lifestyle promotion in low cardiovascular risk patients in Primary Care (PC). Methods: A formative study was conducted based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW). It comprised semi-structured interviews with PC professionals to define the problem in behavioral terms; focus groups with Family Physicians and patients to identify the determinants (barriers and facilitators) of inappropriate statin prescription and of healthy lifestyle promotion practice; mapping of behavioral change interventions operationalized as de-implementation strategies for addressing identified determinants; and consensus techniques for prioritization of strategies based on perceived effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability. Results: Identified key determinants of statin prescription and healthy lifestyle promotion were: the lack of time and clinical inertia, external resources, patients' preferences and characteristics, limitation of available clinical tools and guidelines, social pressures, fears about negative consequences of not treating, and lack of skills and training of professionals. Fourteen potential de-implementation strategies were mapped to the identified determinants and the following were prioritized: 1) non-reflective decision assistance strategies based on reminders and decision support tools for helping clinical decision-making; 2) decision information strategies based on the principles of knowledge dissemination (e.g., corporative diffusion of evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines and Pathways for CVD primary prevention); 3) reflective decision-making restructuring strategies (i.e., audit and feedback provided along with intention formation interventions). Conclusions: This study supports the usefulness of the BCW to guide the design and development of de-implementation strategies targeting the determinants of clinicians' decision-making processes to favor the abandonment of low-value practices and the uptake of those recommended for CVD primary prevention in low-risk patients. Further research to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of selected strategies is warranted. Clinical trial registration: Sanchez A. De-implementation of Low-value Pharmacological Prescriptions (De-imFAR). ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04022850. Registered July 17, 2019. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04022850.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasede-implementationinappropriate prescribingprimary careprimary preventionstatin

Identifiers

PMID36314033
PMCPMC9606599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.