Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT scans can distinguish between clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma in different imaging protocols.

Bettina Katalin Budai, Róbert Stollmayer, Aladár Dávid Rónaszéki, Borbála Körmendy, Zita Zsombor, Lõrinc Palotás, Bence Fejér, Attila Szendrõi, Eszter Székely, Pál Maurovich-Horvat and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Technological Advancements in Interventional Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bettina Katalin BudaiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Róbert StollmayerDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Aladár Dávid RónaszékiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Borbála KörmendyDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zita ZsomborDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Lõrinc PalotásDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bence FejérDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila SzendrõiDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter SzékelyDepartment of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Pál Maurovich-HorvatDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Pál Novák KaposiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to construct a radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model for differentiation between non-clear cell and clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) that is robust against institutional imaging protocols and scanners. Materials and methods: Preoperative unenhanced (UN), corticomedullary (CM), and excretory (EX) phase CT scans from 209 patients diagnosed with RCCs were retrospectively collected. After the three-dimensional segmentation, 107 radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the tumor volumes in each contrast phase. For the ML analysis, the cases were randomly split into training and test sets with a 3:1 ratio. Highly correlated RFs were filtered out based on Pearson's correlation coefficient ( Results: The training set consisted of 121 ccRCCs and 38 non-ccRCCs, while the independent internal test set contained 40 ccRCCs and 13 non-ccRCCs. For external validation, 50 ccRCCs and 23 non-ccRCCs were identified from the KiTS19 dataset with the available UN, CM, and EX phase CTs. After filtering out the highly correlated and poorly reproducible features, the LASSO algorithm selected 10 CM phase RFs that were then used for model construction. During external validation, the SVC achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.83, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.74, respectively. UN and/or EX phase RFs did not further increase the model's performance. Meanwhile, in the same comparison, the expert radiologist achieved similar performance with an AUC of 0.77, an accuracy of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.84, and a specificity of 0.69. Conclusion: Radiomics analysis of CM phase CT scans combined with ML can achieve comparable performance with an expert radiologist in differentiating ccRCCs from non-ccRCCs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputed tomographymachine learningradiomics analysisrenal cell carcinomatexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID36314024
PMCPMC9606401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.