ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT scans can distinguish between clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma in different imaging protocols.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-invasive prediction of nuclear grade in renal cell carcinoma using CT-Based radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Utility of Tumor Sphericity on CT for Differentiating Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026Article
- CT-Based Radiomics in the Characterization of Solid Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Advancing Genitourinary Cancer Surgery: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Role of ctDNA Fragmentomics and Epigenetic Signatures in the Early Detection, Minimal Residual Disease Assessment, and Precision Monitoring of Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Fuhrman Grading Using Multiphasic CT-Based Texture Analysis and Machine Learning Techniques.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- Emerging Trends in AI and Radiomics for Bladder, Kidney, and Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Computed tomography texture analysis to discriminate fungal and non-fungal infected fluid collections.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Technological Advancements in Interventional Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- CT-based radiomics signature for differentiating pyelocaliceal upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma from infiltrative renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models in Diagnosis and Treatment of Kidney Diseases: Current Status and Prospects.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to construct a radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model for differentiation between non-clear cell and clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) that is robust against institutional imaging protocols and scanners. Materials and methods: Preoperative unenhanced (UN), corticomedullary (CM), and excretory (EX) phase CT scans from 209 patients diagnosed with RCCs were retrospectively collected. After the three-dimensional segmentation, 107 radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the tumor volumes in each contrast phase. For the ML analysis, the cases were randomly split into training and test sets with a 3:1 ratio. Highly correlated RFs were filtered out based on Pearson's correlation coefficient ( Results: The training set consisted of 121 ccRCCs and 38 non-ccRCCs, while the independent internal test set contained 40 ccRCCs and 13 non-ccRCCs. For external validation, 50 ccRCCs and 23 non-ccRCCs were identified from the KiTS19 dataset with the available UN, CM, and EX phase CTs. After filtering out the highly correlated and poorly reproducible features, the LASSO algorithm selected 10 CM phase RFs that were then used for model construction. During external validation, the SVC achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.83, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.74, respectively. UN and/or EX phase RFs did not further increase the model's performance. Meanwhile, in the same comparison, the expert radiologist achieved similar performance with an AUC of 0.77, an accuracy of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.84, and a specificity of 0.69. Conclusion: Radiomics analysis of CM phase CT scans combined with ML can achieve comparable performance with an expert radiologist in differentiating ccRCCs from non-ccRCCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.