Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36314009›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Artificial intelligence to improve polyp detection and screening time in colon capsule endoscopy.

Pere Gilabert, Jordi Vitrià, Pablo Laiz, Carolina Malagelada, Angus Watson, Hagen Wenzek, Santi Segui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pere GilabertDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi VitriàDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pablo LaizDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carolina MalageladaDigestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Angus WatsonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, NHS Highland, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Hagen WenzekCorporateHealth International ApS, Odense, Denmark.
Santi SeguiDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) is a minimally invasive procedure which is increasingly being used as an alternative to conventional colonoscopy. Videos recorded by the capsule cameras are long and require one or more experts' time to review and identify polyps or other potential intestinal problems that can lead to major health issues. We developed and tested a multi-platform web application, AI-Tool, which embeds a Convolution Neural Network (CNN) to help CCE reviewers. With the help of artificial intelligence, AI-Tool is able to detect images with high probability of containing a polyp and prioritize them during the reviewing process. With the collaboration of 3 experts that reviewed 18 videos, we compared the classical linear review method using RAPID Reader Software v9.0 and the new software we present. Applying the new strategy, reviewing time was reduced by a factor of 6 and polyp detection sensitivity was increased from 81.08 to 87.80%.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecolon capsule endoscopycolorectal cancer preventionpolyp detectionscreening time

Identifiers

PMID36314009
PMCPMC9606587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.