ArticleEJIFCC2022
Utility of Biochemical Markers in Predicting Severe COVID-19: Experience from a Tertiary Hospital in South India.
Article in EJIFCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Obesity as a Risk Factor for Complications and Mortality in Individuals with SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- The Association Between Peak IL-6 Levels, In-Hospital Mortality, and Selected Risk Factors in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 at the Temporary Hospital in Gdansk-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Signatures of Circulating Protein and Cellular Host Responses Predicting COVID-19 Severity.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients can present with a wide array of symptoms. For laboratory investigation of these patients several biochemical tests are routinely requested. Here we wanted to evaluate the utility of procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin, D-dimer, interleukin 6 (IL-6) and total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in predicting severe COVID-19 infection. Patients and methods: This study was undertaken at a tertiary care medical hospital in Tamil Nadu, India representing 183 COVID-19 RT-PCR positive patients, who were grouped based on their disease severity as mild (n=21), moderate (n=115) and severe (n=47) cohorts. All routine clinical chemistry analysis was performed as part of routine baseline assessment. Biomarkers of inflammation and infection were tested via the measurement of IL-6, PCT, ferritin, and D-dimer. Serum IL-6 concentration was estimated by ELISA, while total LDH activity was analyzed by kinetic colorimetric assay. Serum ferritin, PCT and D-dimer were measured by fluorescent immunoassay by sandwich immuno-detection method. Results: Biomarkers were significantly different among subgroups, and the highest concentrations were found in those with intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Serum PCT showed the best power to predict the need for ICU treatment followed by D-dimer, IL-6 and total LDH. Based on the AUC-ROC analysis, mortality was most effectively indicated by D-dimer followed by PCT, LDH, IL-6 and ferritin. Conclusion: Our study highlights the utility of some routinely available biochemical tests in the management of severe COVID-19. The higher baseline values of these biomarkers hint towards the probability of severe infection and a larger risk of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36313911PMC9562479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.