ReviewEJIFCC2022
Performance of Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Roche) and VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Biomérieux) for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid and Spike Protein Antibody Detection.
Review in EJIFCC, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive, comparative evaluation of 25 automated SARS-CoV-2 serology assays.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- High immunity and low mortality after Omicron and mass event in Cameroon despite low vaccination.Journal of public health in Africa · 2024Article
- Variant-specific antibody profiling for tracking SARS-CoV-2 variant infections in children and adolescents.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel viral pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in humans, has spread worldwide since its identification in late 2019. The pandemic produced an accelerated development of new serological techniques for diagnosis. Methods: We evaluated two commercial assays for serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, approved by the Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) in Argentina: Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2; Roche for nucleocapsid total antibody detection, and VIDAS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioMérieux for spike protein IgG antibody detection. Sensitivity was assessed using a panel of 92 plasma samples from recovered COVID-19 patients who were positive for RT-PCR and positive for neutralizing antibodies by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and/or positive for IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Specificity was determined studying 71 plasma samples collected during year 2018 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Assays were evaluated as stand-alone tests. Results: Sensitivity was 97.8% and 98.9% for the Roche and bioMérieux assays, respectively, specificity: 98.5% (Roche) and 97.1% (bioMérieux), positive predictive value (PPV): 98.9% (Roche) and 97.8% (bioMérieux), and negative predictive value: (NPV) 97.2% (Roche) and 98.5% (bioMérieux). Additionally, Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated high concordance (k=0.950) between Roche and bioMérieux. Discussion: In conclusion, our results evidenced a very good performance for the nucleocapsid antibody assay (Roche) and the spike protein antibody assay (bioMérieux), thus both platforms are equally adequate for indirect diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection through total antibodies and IgG antibody detection, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36313907PMC9562483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.