Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Implementation of corneal confocal microscopy for screening and early detection of diabetic neuropathy in primary care alongside retinopathy screening: Results from a feasibility study.

Josie Carmichael, Hassan Fadavi, Fukashi Ishibashi, Susan Howard, Andrew J M Boulton, Angela C Shore, Mitra Tavakoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Diabetic keratopathy and nuclear proteins (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is the 10 g monofilament fit for purpose for diagnosing DPN?BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Update on Corneal Confocal Microscopy Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Josie CarmichaelExeter Centre of Excellence for Diabetes Research, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility, and Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Hassan FadaviPeripheral Neuropathy Group, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Fukashi IshibashiInternal Medicine, Ishibashi Medical and Diabetes Centre, Hiroshima, Japan.
Susan HowardNational Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC), Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew J M BoultonUniversity of Manchester, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Angela C ShoreExeter Centre of Excellence for Diabetes Research, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility, and Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Mitra TavakoliExeter Centre of Excellence for Diabetes Research, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility, and Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is essential for early detection and timely intervention. Quantitative assessment of small nerve fiber damage is key to the early diagnosis and assessment of its progression. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a non-invasive, in-vivo diagnostic technique that provides an accurate surrogate biomarker for small-fiber neuropathy. In this novel study for the first time, we introduced CCM to primary care as a screening tool for DPN alongside retinopathy screening to assess the level of neuropathy in this novel cohort. Research design and methods: 450 consecutive subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending for annual eye screening in primary care optometry settings underwent assessment with CCM to establish the prevalence of sub-clinical diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Subjects underwent assessment for neurological and ocular symptoms of diabetes and a history of diabetic foot disease, neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Results: CCM examination was completed successfully in 427 (94.9%) subjects, 22% of whom had neuropathy according to Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score. The prevalence of sub-clinical neuropathy as defined by abnormal corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) was 12.9%. In the subjects with a short duration of type 2 diabetes, 9.2% had abnormal CNFL. CCM showed significant abnormalities in corneal nerve parameters in this cohort of subjects with reduction of corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD, p<0.001), CNFL (p<0.001) and corneal nerve branch density (CNBD, p<0.001) compared to healthy subjects. In subjects who had no evidence of DR (67% of all subjects), 12.0% had abnormal CNFL. Conclusions: CCM may be a sensitive biomarker for early detection and screening of DPN in primary care alongside retinopathy screening.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyBiomarkersCorneaEarly DiagnosisFeasibility StudiesHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalPrimary Health CareBiomarkerscorneal confocal microscopydiabetic neuropathydiagnosisearly detectionscreening

Identifiers

PMID36313738
PMCPMC9597366
OpenAlexW4304789128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.