Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The expression of cuproptosis-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and their relationships with prognosis.

Xueying Zhao, Jin Chen, Shangqi Yin, Jingren Shi, Mei Zheng, Chaonan He, Huan Meng, Ying Han, Jinyu Han, Jingjing Guo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [ATPase HZhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Citric Acid Cycle Genes and Nutrigenetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Role of cuproptosis in digestive system tumors (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xueying ZhaoCollege of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Jin ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shangqi YinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jingren ShiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mei ZhengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chaonan HeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Huan MengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying HanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jinyu HanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jingjing GuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhengrong YuanCollege of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Yajie WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The mechanism of cuproptosis has recently been reported in lipoylated proteins of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Besides, the role of copper was previously recognized in cancer progression. We evaluated the prognostic value of cuproptosis-related gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Remarkable genes were selected both in differential expression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis from ninety-six cuproptosis-related genes using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The relationships between clinical characteristics and gene expression were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression. Clinicopathologic factors correlated with overall survival in HCCs conducting univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) databases were utilized to verify the results. Furthermore, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) identified the potential key pathways that dominate cuproptosis in HCC. Results: Elevated Conclusions: The twenty cuproptosis-related genes might be utilized as new candidate prognostic biomarkers for HCC.

Indexed as

bioinformaticscuproptosishepatocellular carcinomaprognosisTCGA

Identifiers

PMID36313717
PMCPMC9614267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.