Low anterior resection syndrome: An unavoidable price to pay to preserve the rectum?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Anorectal functional disorders following organ-preserving treatment and resection of rectal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
   Review
2. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, Role of SNM?Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
   Review
3. From Diversion to Permanence: Trends in Ostomy Creation in Rectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Review
4. A word of caution in the functional monitoring of patients after rectal cancer surgery: a multicentre observational study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025
   Observational
5. Prediction model construction for the occurrence of LARS after neoadjuvant therapy combined with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in male patients with mid-low rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as