Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313674›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development and validation of a novel prognosis prediction model for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Haiping Liang, Yue Feng, Yuancheng Guo, Jinli Jian, Long Zhao, Xingchun Luo, Lili Tao, Bei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haiping LiangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yue FengDepartment of Blood Transfusion, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yuancheng GuoThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jinli JianThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Long ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xingchun LuoDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Lili TaoThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Bei LiuDepartment of Hematology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Somatic mutations are widespread in patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and are associated with prognosis. However, a practical prognostic model for MDS that incorporates somatic mutations urgently needs to be developed. Methods: A cohort of 201 MDS patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to develop the model, and a single-center cohort of 115 MDS cohorts from Northwest China was used for external validation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the effects of karyotype classifications and gene mutations on the prognosis of MDS patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Lasso regression were used to screen for key prognostic factors. The shinyapps website was used to create dynamic nomograms with multiple variables. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's discrimination, accuracy and clinical utility. Results: Six risk factors (age, bone morrow blast percentage, ETV6, TP53, EZH2, and ASXL1) were considered as predictor variables in the nomogram. The nomogram showed excellent discrimination, with respective the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.850, 0.839, 0.933 for the training cohort at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years; 0.715, 0.802 and 0.750 for the testing cohort at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years; and 0.668, 0.646 and 0.731 for the external validation cohort at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years. The calibration curves and decision curve showed that the nomogram had good consistency and clinical practical benefit. Finally, a stratified analysis showed that MDS patients with high risk had worse survival outcomes than patients with low risk. Conclusion: We developed a nomogram containing six risk factors, which provides reliable and objective predictions of prognosis for MDS patients.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic Syndromenomogramprognosisrisk stratificationsomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID36313674
PMCPMC9597308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.