Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2022

Meiotic chromosome dynamics and double strand break formation in reptiles.

Laia Marín-Gual, Laura González-Rodelas, Maria M Garcias, Lukáš Kratochvíl, Nicole Valenzuela, Arthur Georges, Paul D Waters, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gonadal sex and temperature independently influence germ cell differentiation and meiotic progression inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laia Marín-GualDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Laura González-RodelasDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Maria M GarciasDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Lukáš KratochvílDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nicole ValenzuelaDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Arthur GeorgesInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Paul D WatersSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aurora Ruiz-HerreraDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiotic prophase I, tightly regulated processes take place, from pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes to recombination, which are essential for the generation of genetically variable haploid gametes. These processes have canonical meiotic features conserved across different phylogenetic groups. However, the dynamics of meiotic prophase I in non-mammalian vertebrates are poorly known. Here, we compare four species from Sauropsida to understand the regulation of meiotic prophase I in reptiles: the Australian central bearded dragon (

Indexed as

bouquetDSBsgametogenesismeiosismicro-chromosomesrecombinationreptile

Identifiers

PMID36313577
PMCPMC9597255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.