ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2022
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Multifunctional 3D-Printed Titanium Alloy Composite-Coated Scaffold for Modulating the Immune Microenvironment and Promoting Osteogenesis.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles -mediated bone regeneration: mechanisms, targeted delivery, and clinical perspectives in promoting angiogenesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Don't judge an implant by its cover: how the foreign body response and fibrotic capsule might be harnessed for good.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-based strategies for bone cement: modulating the bone microenvironment and promoting regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- 3D-printed artificial bone scaffolds: the design of materials, the incorporation of bioactive substances, and the integration of vascularized tissue flaps.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- A Novel Strategy to Enhance the Bone Healing Efficacy of Composite Scaffolds via Induction of Cell Recruitment and Vascularization.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
- Porous metal materials for applications in orthopedic field: A review on mechanisms in bone healing.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Review
- Cuttlefish Bone-Derived Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics Have Enhanced Osteogenic Properties.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Towards Stem Cell Therapy for Critical-Sized Segmental Bone Defects: Current Trends and Challenges on the Path to Clinical Translation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Reconstruction of an Extensive Segmental Radial Shaft Bone Defect by Vascularized 3D-Printed Graft Cage.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Bone Regenerative Capacity of the Novel Nanobiomaterial: β-Tricalcium Phosphate Polylactic Acid-co-Glycolide (β-TCP/PLLA/PGA) for Use in Maxillofacial Bone Defects.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recent advancement in vascularized tissue-engineered bone based on materials design and modification.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Hydrothermally treated coral scaffold promotes proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells and enhances segmental bone defect healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- β-TCP from 3D-printed composite scaffolds acts as an effective phosphate source during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Looking forward to a better 2023 and beyond.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022Article
- Unlocking the regenerative key: Targeting stem cell factors for bone renewal.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neovascularization is critical for bone regeneration. Numerous studies have explored prevascularization preimplant strategies, ranging from calcium phosphate cement (CPC) scaffolds to co-culturing CPCs with stem cells. The aim of the present study was to evaluate an alternative Methods: The morphology of β-TCPs was characterized by scanning electron microscopy. After 3 weeks of prevascularization within a muscle pouch at the lateral size of rat tibia, we transplanted prevascularized macroporous β-TCPs in segmental tibia defects, using blank β-TCPs as a control. Extent of neovascularization was determined by angiography and immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluations. Tibia samples were collected at different time points for biomechanical, radiological, and histological analyses. RT-PCR and western blotting were used to evaluate angio- and osteo-specific markers. Results: With macroporous β-TCPs, we documented more vascular and supporting tissue invasion in the macroporous β-TCPs with prior Conclusion: This novel The translational potential of this article: This study indicates a novel in vivo prevascularization strategy for growing vasculature on β-TCP scaffolds to be used for repair of large segmental bone defects, might serve as a promising tissue-engineered bone grafts in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.