Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313431›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Multifactorial methods integrating haplotype and epistasis effects for genomic estimation and prediction of quantitative traits.

Yang Da, Zuoxiang Liang, Dzianis Prakapenka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of scale parameter for marker variance prior in some Bayesian whole-genome regression methods.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic prediction with haplotype blocks in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang DaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Zuoxiang LiangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Dzianis PrakapenkaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

Genomic discovery and prediction for quantitative traits with complex genetic mechanismsR01HG012425 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DA, YANG · 2022 to 2024
$729k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth in genomic selection data provides unprecedented opportunities to discover and utilize complex genetic effects for improving phenotypes, but the methodology is lacking. Epistasis effects are interaction effects, and haplotype effects may contain local high-order epistasis effects. Multifactorial methods with SNP, haplotype, and epistasis effects up to the third-order are developed to investigate the contributions of global low-order and local high-order epistasis effects to the phenotypic variance and the accuracy of genomic prediction of quantitative traits. These methods include genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with associated reliability for individuals with and without phenotypic observations, including a computationally efficient GBLUP method for large validation populations, and genomic restricted maximum estimation (GREML) of the variance and associated heritability using a combination of EM-REML and AI-REML iterative algorithms. These methods were developed for two models, Model-I with 10 effect types and Model-II with 13 effect types, including intra- and inter-chromosome pairwise epistasis effects that replace the pairwise epistasis effects of Model-I. GREML heritability estimate and GBLUP effect estimate for each effect of an effect type are derived, except for third-order epistasis effects. The multifactorial models evaluate each effect type based on the phenotypic values adjusted for the remaining effect types and can use more effect types than separate models of SNP, haplotype, and epistasis effects, providing a methodology capability to evaluate the contributions of complex genetic effects to the phenotypic variance and prediction accuracy and to discover and utilize complex genetic effects for improving the phenotypes of quantitative traits.

Indexed as

epistasisGBLUPGREMLhaplotypemultifactorial modelSNP

Identifiers

PMID36313431
PMCPMC9614238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.