Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313422›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Partial Least Squares Enhances Genomic Prediction of New Environments.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Kismiantini, Armando Roman-Gallardo, Keith Gardner, Morten Lillemo, Roberto Fritsche-Neto, José Crossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-variant GWAS and genomic prediction dissect the genetic architecture underlying tomato fruit weight.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Surprising regulatory plasticity for the conserved HOG pathway in diversebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. GIS-FA: an approach to integrating thematic maps, factor-analytic, and envirotyping for cultivar targeting.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.
KismiantiniStatistics Study Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Armando Roman-GallardoFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Keith GardnerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Morten LillemoDepartment of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, IHA/CIGENE, Ås, Norway.
Roberto Fritsche-NetoLaboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plant breeding, the need to improve the prediction of future seasons or new locations and/or environments, also denoted as "leave one environment out," is of paramount importance to increase the genetic gain in breeding programs and contribute to food and nutrition security worldwide. Genomic selection (GS) has the potential to increase the accuracy of future seasons or new locations because it is a predictive methodology. However, most statistical machine learning methods used for the task of predicting a new environment or season struggle to produce moderate or high prediction accuracies. For this reason, in this study we explore the use of the partial least squares (PLS) regression methodology for this specific task, and we benchmark its performance with the Bayesian Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP) method. The benchmarking process was done with 14 real datasets. We found that in all datasets the PLS method outperformed the popular GBLUP method by margins between 0% (in the Indica data) and 228.28% (in the Disease data) across traits, environments, and types of predictors. Our results show great empirical evidence of the power of the PLS methodology for the prediction of future seasons or new environments.

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisBayesian genomic-enabled predictiondisease datagenotype x environment interactionmaize and wheat datapartial least squares

Identifiers

PMID36313422
PMCPMC9608852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.