Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Prediction of fat-free mass in a multi-ethnic cohort of infants using bioelectrical impedance: Validation against the PEA POD.

Jaz Lyons-Reid, Leigh C Ward, José G B Derraik, Mya-Thway Tint, Cathriona R Monnard, Jose M Ramos Nieves, Benjamin B Albert, Timothy Kenealy, Keith M Godfrey, Shiao-Yng Chan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Jaz Lyons-ReidLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Leigh C WardSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
José G B DerraikLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mya-Thway TintSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Cathriona R MonnardNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jose M Ramos NievesNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benjamin B AlbertLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Timothy KenealyLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Shiao-Yng ChanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Wayne S CutfieldLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZNestlé (Switzerland) · CHNational University of Singapore · SGSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences · SGUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Queensland · AUUppsala University · SE

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is widely used to measure body composition but has not been adequately evaluated in infancy. Prior studies have largely been of poor quality, and few included healthy term-born offspring, so it is unclear if BIA can accurately predict body composition at this age. Aim: This study evaluated impedance technology to predict fat-free mass (FFM) among a large multi-ethnic cohort of infants from the United Kingdom, Singapore, and New Zealand at ages 6 weeks and 6 months ( Materials and methods: Using air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD) as the reference, two impedance approaches were evaluated: (1) empirical prediction equations; (2) Cole modeling and mixture theory prediction. Sex-specific equations were developed among ∼70% of the cohort. Equations were validated in the remaining ∼30% and in an independent University of Queensland cohort. Mixture theory estimates of FFM were validated using the entire cohort at both ages. Results: Sex-specific equations based on weight and length explained 75-81% of FFM variance at 6 weeks but only 48-57% at 6 months. At both ages, the margin of error for these equations was 5-6% of mean FFM, as assessed by the root mean squared errors (RMSE). The stepwise addition of clinically-relevant covariates (i.e., gestational age, birthweight SDS, subscapular skinfold thickness, abdominal circumference) improved model accuracy (i.e., lowered RMSE). However, improvements in model accuracy were not consistently observed when impedance parameters (as the impedance index) were incorporated instead of length. The bioimpedance equations had mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) < 5% when validated. Limits of agreement analyses showed that biases were low (< 100 g) and limits of agreement were narrower for bioimpedance-based than anthropometry-based equations, with no clear benefit following the addition of clinically-relevant variables. Estimates of FFM from BIS mixture theory prediction were inaccurate (MAPE 11-12%). Conclusion: The addition of the impedance index improved the accuracy of empirical FFM predictions. However, improvements were modest, so the benefits of using bioimpedance in the field remain unclear and require further investigation. Mixture theory prediction of FFM from BIS is inaccurate in infancy and cannot be recommended.

Indexed as

air displacement plethysmography (ADP)biasbioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS)body compositionfat-free mass (FFM)validation

Identifiers

PMID36313113
PMCPMC9606768
OpenAlexW4304845771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.