ArticleProceedings. International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence2021
Application of Machine Learning to Sleep Stage Classification.
Article in Proceedings. International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards interpretable sleep stage classification with a multi-stream fusion network.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Monitoring Opioid-Use-Disorder Treatment Adherence Using Smartwatch Gesture Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of sleep quality and influencing factors among medical and non-medical students using machine learning techniques in Fujian during the public health emergencies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- A deep learning software tool for automated sleep staging in rats via single channel EEG.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2025Article
- SLA-MLP: Enhancing Sleep Stage Analysis from EEG Signals Using Multilayer Perceptron Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Toward Concurrent Identification of Human Activities with a Single Unifying Neural Network Classification: First Step.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Detecting Medication-Taking Gestures Using Machine Learning and Accelerometer Data Collected via Smartwatch Technology: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Kynurenine aminotransferase II inhibition promotes sleep and rescues impairments induced by neurodevelopmental insult.Translational psychiatry · 2023Article
- Digital health technology combining wearable gait sensors and machine learning improve the accuracy in prediction of frailty.Frontiers in public health · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep studies are imperative to recapitulate phenotypes associated with sleep loss and uncover mechanisms contributing to psychopathology. Most often, investigators manually classify the polysomnography into vigilance states, which is time-consuming, requires extensive training, and is prone to inter-scorer variability. While many works have successfully developed automated vigilance state classifiers based on multiple EEG channels, we aim to produce an automated and openaccess classifier that can reliably predict vigilance state based on a single cortical electroencephalogram (EEG) from rodents to minimize the disadvantages that accompany tethering small animals via wires to computer programs. Approximately 427 hours of continuously monitored EEG, electromyogram (EMG), and activity were labeled by a domain expert out of 571 hours of total data. Here we evaluate the performance of various machine learning techniques on classifying 10-second epochs into one of three discrete classes: paradoxical, slow-wave, or wake. Our investigations include Decision Trees, Random Forests, Naive Bayes Classifiers, Logistic Regression Classifiers, and Artificial Neural Networks. These methodologies have achieved accuracies ranging from approximately 74% to approximately 96%. Most notably, the Random Forest and the ANN achieved remarkable accuracies of 95.78% and 93.31%, respectively. Here we have shown the potential of various machine learning classifiers to automatically, accurately, and reliably classify vigilance states based on a single EEG reading and a single EMG reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.