Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313065›Full record

ArticleProceedings. International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence2021

Application of Machine Learning to Sleep Stage Classification.

Andrew Smith, Hardik Anand, Snezana Milosavljevic, Katherine M Rentschler, Ana Pocivavsek, Homayoun Valafar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew SmithDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (University of South Carolina), Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Hardik AnandDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (University of South Carolina), Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Snezana MilosavljevicDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Katherine M RentschlerDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Ana PocivavsekDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Homayoun ValafarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (University of South Carolina), Columbia, SC 29208 USA.

Funding

Kynurenic Acid, Sleep and CognitionR01NS102209 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI POCIVAVSEK, ANA · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep studies are imperative to recapitulate phenotypes associated with sleep loss and uncover mechanisms contributing to psychopathology. Most often, investigators manually classify the polysomnography into vigilance states, which is time-consuming, requires extensive training, and is prone to inter-scorer variability. While many works have successfully developed automated vigilance state classifiers based on multiple EEG channels, we aim to produce an automated and openaccess classifier that can reliably predict vigilance state based on a single cortical electroencephalogram (EEG) from rodents to minimize the disadvantages that accompany tethering small animals via wires to computer programs. Approximately 427 hours of continuously monitored EEG, electromyogram (EMG), and activity were labeled by a domain expert out of 571 hours of total data. Here we evaluate the performance of various machine learning techniques on classifying 10-second epochs into one of three discrete classes: paradoxical, slow-wave, or wake. Our investigations include Decision Trees, Random Forests, Naive Bayes Classifiers, Logistic Regression Classifiers, and Artificial Neural Networks. These methodologies have achieved accuracies ranging from approximately 74% to approximately 96%. Most notably, the Random Forest and the ANN achieved remarkable accuracies of 95.78% and 93.31%, respectively. Here we have shown the potential of various machine learning classifiers to automatically, accurately, and reliably classify vigilance states based on a single EEG reading and a single EMG reading.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceelectrophysiologymachine learningneurosciencesleep-scoring

Identifiers

PMID36313065
PMCPMC9597665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.