Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313047›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2022

Translational Applications of Machine Learning in Auditory Electrophysiology.

Spencer Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Applications of Machine Learning in Meniere's Disease Assessment Based on Pure-Tone Audiometry.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Spencer SmithDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Funding

Investigating the Relationship between Objective Measures of Binaural Hearing and Speech-in-Noise Performance in Middle-Aged ListenersK01DC017192 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SMITH, SPENCER · 2018 to 2020
$411k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC017192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is transforming nearly every aspect of modern life including medicine and its subfields, such as hearing science. This article presents a brief conceptual overview of selected ML approaches and describes how these techniques are being applied to outstanding problems in hearing science, with a particular focus on auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Two vignettes are presented in which ML is used to analyze subcortical AEP data. The first vignette demonstrates how ML can be used to determine if auditory learning has influenced auditory neurophysiologic function. The second vignette demonstrates how ML analysis of AEPs may be useful in determining whether hearing devices are optimized for discriminating speech sounds.

Indexed as

auditory evoked potentialsmachine learningotoacoustic emissions

Identifiers

PMID36313047
PMCPMC9605807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.