Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Randomized, sham-controlled, clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with Alzheimer's dementia in Japan.

Youichi Saitoh, Koichi Hosomi, Tomoo Mano, Yasushi Takeya, Shinji Tagami, Nobuhiko Mori, Akiyoshi Matsugi, Yasutomo Jono, Hideaki Harada, Tomomi Yamada and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Youichi SaitohDepartment of Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koichi HosomiDepartment of Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoo ManoDepartment of Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi TakeyaDepartment of Geriatric and General Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shinji TagamiDepartment of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Nobuhiko MoriDepartment of Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Akiyoshi MatsugiFaculty of Rehabilitation, Shijonawate Gakuen University, Osaka, Japan.
Yasutomo JonoFaculty of Health Sciences, Naragakuen University, Nara, Japan.
Hideaki HaradaDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tomomi YamadaDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Akimitsu MiyakeDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University · JPOsaka University Hospital · JPNaragakuen University · JPShijonawate Gakuen University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several medications have been applied to Alzheimer's dementia patients (AD) but their efficacies have been insufficient. The efficacy and safety of 4 weeks of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in Japanese AD were evaluated in this exploratory clinical trial. Methods: Forty-two patients, aged 60-93 years (average, 76.4 years), who were taking medication (> 6 months) and had Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores ≤ 25 and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale scores (CDR-J) of 1 or 2, were enrolled in this single-center, prospective, randomized, three-arm study [i.e., 120% resting motor threshold (120% RMT), 90% RMT for the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and Sham]. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Japanese Cognitive (ADAS-J cog), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), Neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI), and EuroQOL 5 Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) were administered. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the MMSE score (week 4). An active rTMS session involved applying 15 trains bilaterally (40 pulses/train at 10 Hz; intertrain interval, 26 s). Participants received ≥ 8 interventions within the first 2 weeks and at least one intervention weekly in the 3rd and 4th weeks. Full Analysis set (FAS) included 40 patients [120% RMT ( Results: In the FAS, MMSE, ADAS-J cog, MoCA-J, CDR-J, CGIC, NPI, and EQ-5D-5L scores between the three groups were not significantly different. Two patients were erroneously switched between the 120% RMT and 90% RMT groups, therefore, "as treated" patients were mainly analyzed. Conclusion: This paper is the first report of using rTMS in Japanese AD patients. The treatment seems safe and moderate-mild stage AD should be target population of pivotal clinical trial with 120% RMT rTMS.

Indexed as

ADAS-cogAlzheimer’s dementiaMMSEMoCA-Jrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36313021
PMCPMC9606646
OpenAlexW4304842991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.