Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312993›Full record

ArticleFood science and biotechnology2022

α-Glucosidase, α-amylase inhibition kinetics

Kasipandi Muniyandi, Gayathri Jagadeesan, Blassan P George, Ashwini Lydia Manoharan, Gayathri Nataraj, Heidi Abrahamse, Parimelazhagan Thangaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Green-ExtractedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects ofFood science and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kasipandi MuniyandiBioprospecting Laboratory, Department of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641-046 India.
Gayathri JagadeesanBioprospecting Laboratory, Department of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641-046 India.
Blassan P GeorgeLaser Research Centre, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ashwini Lydia ManoharanBioprospecting Laboratory, Department of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641-046 India.
Gayathri NatarajBioprospecting Laboratory, Department of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641-046 India.
Heidi AbrahamseLaser Research Centre, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Parimelazhagan ThangarajBioprospecting Laboratory, Department of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641-046 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rich source of nutrients, figs have a number of clinically validated benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion, and the antidiabetic and anticancer activity of Graphical abstract:

Indexed as

AntioxidantApoptosisCancerFigα-Amylaseα-Glucosidase

Identifiers

PMID36312993
PMCPMC9596651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.