Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312900›Full record

ReviewMRS communications2022

Material extrusion additive manufacturing of dense pastes consisting of macroscopic particles.

Alexandra Marnot, Alexandra Dobbs, Blair Brettmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MRS communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Polydiolcitrate-MoSACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  3. Cold Temperature Direct Air COACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A polydiolcitrate-MoSbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra MarnotChemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6737-2058
Alexandra DobbsChemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8728-6675
Blair BrettmannChemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1335-2120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of dense pastes, those with greater than 50 vol% particles, via material extrusion direct ink write is a promising method to produce customized structures for high-performance materials, such as energetic materials and pharmaceuticals, as well as to enable the use of waste or other locally available particles. However, the high volume fraction and the large sizes of the particles for these applications lead to significant challenges in developing inks and processing methods to prepare quality parts. In this prospective, we analyze challenges in managing particle characteristics, stabilizing the suspensions, mixing the particles and binder, and 3D printing the pastes. Graphical abstract:

Indexed as

3D printingAdditive manufacturingCompositeMixtureParticulatePaste

Identifiers

PMID36312900
PMCPMC9596591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.