Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312875›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2019

Selection-Corrected Statistical Inference for Region Detection With High-Throughput Assays.

Yuval Benjamini, Jonathan Taylor, Rafael A Irizarry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inverse set estimation and inversion of simultaneous confidence intervals.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2024
    Article
  2. Selective inference forJournal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuval BenjaminiDepartment of Statistics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
Jonathan TaylorDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University.
Rafael A IrizarryDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University.

Funding

Preprocessing and Analysis Tools for High-Throughput TechnologiesR01GM083084 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2007 to 2018
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientists use high-dimensional measurement assays to detect and prioritize regions of strong signal in spatially organized domain. Examples include finding methylation enriched genomic regions using microarrays, and active cortical areas using brain-imaging. The most common procedure for detecting potential regions is to group neighboring sites where the signal passed a threshold. However, one needs to account for the selection bias induced by this procedure to avoid diminishing effects when generalizing to a population. This paper introduces pin-down inference, a model and an inference framework that permit population inference for these detected regions. Pin-down inference provides non-asymptotic point and confidence interval estimators for the mean effect in the region that account for local selection bias. Our estimators accommodate non-stationary covariances that are typical of these data, allowing researchers to better compare regions of different sizes and correlation structures. Inference is provided within a conditional one-parameter exponential family per region, with truncations that match the selection constraints. A secondary screening-and-adjustment step allows pruning the set of detected regions, while controlling the false-coverage rate over the reported regions. We apply the method to genomic regions with differing DNA-methylation rates across tissue. Our method provides superior power compared to other conditional and non-parametric approaches.

Indexed as

Bump-huntingConditional inferenceDNA-methylationNon-stationary processSelective inferenceSpatial statistics

Identifiers

PMID36312875
PMCPMC9615469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.