ArticleDigital health
A smart healthcare-based system for classification of dementia using deep learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predicting disease outcomes from remote monitoring using machine learning: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- AI and Wearables for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Passive digital health technologies for Alzheimer's disease screening and diagnosis: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to develop a deep learning-based classification model for early detection of dementia using a wearable device that can measure the electrical conductivity of the skin, temperature, and movement as factors related to dementia, interlocking them with an application, and analyzing the collected data. Methods: This study was conducted on 18 elderly individuals (5 males, 13 females) aged 65 years or older who consented to the study. The Korean Mini-Mental State Examination survey for cognitive function tests was conducted by well-trained researchers. The subjects were first grouped into high- or low-risk group for dementia based on their Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score. Data obtained by wearable devices of each subject were then used for the classification of the high- and low-risk groups of dementia through a smart healthcare-based system implementing a deep neural network with scaled principal component analysis. The correlation coefficients between the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score and the featured data were also investigated. Results: Our study showed that the proposed system using a deep neural network with scaled principal component analysis was effective in detecting individuals at high risk for dementia with up to 99% accuracy and which performance was better compared with commonly used classification algorithms. In addition, it was found that the electrical conductivity of skin had the closest correlation with the results of the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination score among data collected through wearable devices in this study. Conclusions: Our proposed system can contribute to effective early detection of dementia for the elderly, using a non-invasive and easy-to-wear wearable device and classification algorithms with a simple cognitive function test. In the future, we intend to have more subjects participate in the experiment, to include more relevant variables in the wearable device, and to analyze the effectiveness of the smart healthcare-based dementia classification system over the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.