Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312832›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2022

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Qi-Chao Ge, Yu-Fan Wu, Zi-Ming Liu, Zhe Wang, Sheng Wang, Xiang Liu, Nan Ge, Jin-Tao Guo, Si-Yu Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qi-Chao GeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Yu-Fan WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Zi-Ming LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Zhe WangDepartment of Pathology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Sheng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Xiang LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Nan GeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Jin-Tao GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. guojt@sj-hospital.org.
Si-Yu SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with a diameter of < 2 cm are called small GISTs. Currently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is widely used as a regular follow-up method for GISTs, which can also provide a preliminary basis for judging the malignancy potential of lesions. However, there are no studies on the accuracy of EUS to assess the malignant potential of small GISTs.

aimTo evaluate the efficacy of EUS in the diagnosis and risk assessment of small GISTs.

methodsWe collected data from patients with small GISTs who were admitted to Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between October 2014 and July 2019. The accurate diagnosis and risk classifications of patients were based on the pathological assessment according to the modified National Institute of Health criteria after endoscopic resection or laparoscopic surgery. Preoperative EUS features (marginal irregularity, cystic changes, homogeneity, ulceration, and strong echogenic foci) were retrospectively analyzed. The assessment results based on EUS features were compared with the pathological features.

resultsA total of 256 patients (69 men and 187 women) were enrolled. Pathological results included 232, 16, 7, and 1 very low-, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cases, respectively. The most frequent tumor location was the gastric fundus (78.1%), and mitoses were calculated as > 5/50 high power field in 8 (3.1%) patients. Marginal irregularity, ulceration, strong echo foci, and heterogeneity were detected in 1 (0.4%), 2 (0.8%), 22 (8.6%), and 67 (65.1%) patients, respectively. However, cystic changes were not detected. Tumor size was positively correlated with the mitotic index (

conclusionSmall GISTs (diameters > 1.48 cm) with positive EUS features should receive intensive surveillance or undergo endoscopic surgery. EUS and dissection are efficient diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for small GISTs.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsStomach NeoplasmsEndosonographyFemaleHumansMaleMitotic IndexRetrospective StudiesDiagnosisEndoscopic ultrasoundGastrointestinal stromal tumorsRisk classification

Identifiers

PMID36312832
PMCPMC9611709
OpenAlexW4298012261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.