Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312821›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2022

Prevalence and Demographics of Truncal Involvement Among Acne Patients: Survey Data and a Review of the Literature.

Jerry Tan, James Q Del Rosso, Jonathan S Weiss, Alison M Layton, Neal D Bhatia, Krysten Lisella Arekapudi, Firas G Hougeir, Seemal R Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. What's New After NICE Acne Guidelines.Dermatology and therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jerry TanDr. Tan is with Windsor Clinical Research Inc. in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, and the Department of Medicine at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
James Q Del RossoDr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research and Thomas Dermatology in Las Vegas, Nevada and Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery in Maitland, Florida.
Jonathan S WeissDr. Weiss is with Georgia Dermatology Partners and Gwinnett Clinical Research Center Inc. in Snellville, Georgia.
Alison M LaytonDr. Layton is with the Department of Dermatology at Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust in Harrogate, United Kingdom.
Neal D BhatiaDr. Bhatia is with Therapeutics Clinical Research in San Diego, California.
Krysten Lisella ArekapudiDr. Lisella Arekapudi is with Galderma Laboratories L.P. in Fort Worth, Texas.
Firas G HougeirDr. Hougeir is with Southeast Dermatology Specialists in Douglasville, Georgia.
Seemal R DesaiDr. Desai is with the Department of Dermatology at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.Dr. Desai is also with Innovative Dermatology in Plano, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Truncal acne is frequently underdiagnosed despite affecting around half of those with facial acne. The objective was to provide an overview of the literature on the incidence of truncal acne according to age, gender, and acne severity. Methods: A narrative review of data from recent large surveys and a literature search in PubMed on the incidence of truncal acne across subgroups of age, gender, and acne severity. Results: The prevalence of truncal acne alone was low, ranging from <1% to 14%, but approximately 30 to 60 percent of individuals with facial acne also had truncal acne depending on the population. In an online survey in the United States of 2,000 respondents aged between 14 -29 years with self-reported active facial and/or truncal acne, the incidence of truncal acne was lower in the 14-20 years subgroup than in the 21-29 years subgroup (49% vs 54%). The incidence of truncal acne was similar in both males and females, while 46 percent of respondents with self-declared clear and mild acne indicated having truncal involvement compared to 60 percent of those with moderate or severe acne. Limitations: Online surveys have inherent limitations, such as self-reporting and potential confounders. Conclusion: Data suggests that patients with both facial and truncal involvement have earlier onset of acne and more severe acne. Additional adverse psychological impact may arise from having the impression that the disease is spreading and becoming more severe. Raising awareness of truncal acne prevalence and demographics could improve its clinical management to reduce the negative psychological impact.

Indexed as

Acnebackburdenchestdemographicsprevalencetruncaltrunk

Identifiers

PMID36312821
PMCPMC9586532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.