Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312813›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2022

A Scoping Review and Appraisal of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Education Literature.

Peggy K Han, Neha J Purkey, Kevin W Kuo, Kathleen R Ryan, Amanda L Woodward, Ozzie Jahadi, Nicole L Prom, Louis P Halamek, Lindsay C Johnston

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ELSO 2025 Narrative Guideline on ECMO Training and Continuing Education.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peggy K HanDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics.
Neha J PurkeyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics.
Kevin W KuoDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics.
Kathleen R RyanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics.
Amanda L WoodwardLane Medical Library, and.
Ozzie JahadiLucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California; and.
Nicole L PromLucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California; and.
Louis P HalamekDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Lindsay C JohnstonDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite a recent rise in publications describing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) education, the scope and quality of ECMO educational research and curricular assessments have not previously been evaluated. Objective: The purposes of this study are Methods: A multidisciplinary research team conducted a scoping review of ECMO literature published between January 2009 and October 2021 using established frameworks. The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) was applied to assess quality. Results: A total of 1,028 references were retrieved; 36 were selected for review. ECMO education studies frequently targeted the cognitive domain (78%), with 17% of studies targeting the psychomotor domain alone and 33% of studies targeting combinations of the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. Thirty-three studies qualified for MERSQI scoring, with a median score of 11 (interquartile range, 4; possible range, 5-18). Simulation-based training was used in 97%, with 50% of studies targeting physicians and one other discipline. Conclusion: ECMO education frequently incorporates simulation and spans all domains of Bloom's taxonomy. Overall, MERSQI scores for ECMO education studies are similar to those for other simulation-based medical education studies. However, developing assessment tools with multisource validity evidence and conducting multienvironment studies would strengthen future work. The creation of a collaborative ECMO educational network would increase standardization and reproducibility in ECMO training, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

curriculaeducationextracorporeal membrane oxygenationMedical Education Research Study Quality Instrumentscoping review

Identifiers

PMID36312813
PMCPMC9585707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.