Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312788›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022

Sima Nissan, Jerina Boelens, Katrien Lagrou, Dimitri Roels

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sima NissanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jerina BoelensDepartment of Clinical Biology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Katrien LagrouDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Dimitri RoelsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Observations: We present a case of a 69-year-old woman with multiple risk factors for a fungal keratitis including ophthalmological history of herpetic keratitis, contact lens wear and chronic steroid use. At presentation, the corneal ulcer resembled a recurrent herpetic keratitis but evolved into a more dense stromal infiltrate despite antiviral therapy. Microscopic examination, culture and staining of corneal tissue obtained by scraping showed mycelia. PCR and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry confirmed the presence of Conclusions: To our knowledge no other cases of fungal keratitis caused by

Indexed as

Amphotericin BFungal keratitisPyrenocheata unguis-HominisVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID36312788
PMCPMC9614820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.