Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312720›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Five-Strand Hamstring Grafts are Biomechanically Comparable to Four-Strand Grafts and Offer Greater Diameter for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Andrzej Brzezinski, Matthew Nasra, William Pfaff, Casey Imbergamo, Michael Simon, Rae Tarapore, Jorden Xavier, Salim Ghodbane, Charles Gatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrzej BrzezinskiRutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Matthew NasraLenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York.
William PfaffRutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Casey ImbergamoMedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael SimonRutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rae TaraporeMedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jorden XavierRutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Salim GhodbaneRutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Charles GattRutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of 4-strand and 5-strand hamstring constructs for anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Methods: Thirty-six human cadaveric hamstring grafts were tested in 3 different conditions: (1) graft femoral fixation complex, (2) graft femoral and tibial fixation (GFTF) complex using a human model, and (3) GFTF complex using a porcine model. Grafts were tested on a tensile testing machine. Four-stranded grafts served as the control group, and 5-stranded grafts served as the experimental group. Cyclic elongation, ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and diameter of the grafts were analyzed. Results: Average 4-strand graft diameter was 7.96 mm compared to 9.32 mm for the 5-strand graft ( Conclusion: Five-strand hamstring grafts offer greater diameter and are biomechanically comparable to 4-strand equivalents at time 0. Grafts >8 mm offer significantly greater stiffness compared to grafts sized <8 mm. There is a weak positive correlation between graft diameter and stiffness. Clinical Relevance: A potential drawback to hamstring grafts is their variability in size. Five-strand hamstring grafts provide increased diameter in comparison to 4-strand equivalents and might be used when quadrupled graft diameter is <8 mm.

Identifiers

PMID36312720
PMCPMC9596886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.