Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312698›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Wide Variability in Return-to-Sport Criteria used by Team Physicians After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes-A Qualitative Study.

Marcel Betsch, Ali Darwich, Justin Chang, Daniel Whelan, Darrell Ogilvie-Harris, Jaskarndip Chahal, John Theodoropoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Biopsychosocial profiles following ACL reconstruction: A latent class analysis of barriers to return-to-activity.Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcel BetschDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim of the University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Ali DarwichDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim of the University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Justin ChangUniversity of Toronto Orthopedic Sports Medicine Program (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel WhelanUniversity of Toronto Orthopedic Sports Medicine Program (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Darrell Ogilvie-HarrisUniversity of Toronto Orthopedic Sports Medicine Program (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jaskarndip ChahalUniversity of Toronto Orthopedic Sports Medicine Program (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John TheodoropoulosUniversity of Toronto Orthopedic Sports Medicine Program (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore currently used readiness to return to sport (RTS) criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) used in elite athletes to gain novel insights into the RTS decision-making process of professional team physicians. Methods: Eighteen qualitative semistructured interviews with professional team physicians were conducted by a single trained interviewer. The interviews were used to identify team physician concepts and themes regarding the criteria used to determine RTS after ACLR. General inductive analysis and a coding process were used to identify themes and subthemes arising from the data. A hierarchical approach in coding helped to link themes. Results: The most important RTS criteria included muscle strength, followed by satisfactory functional testing including hop tests, a satisfactory clinical examination, joint stability, psychological readiness, time since the ACLR surgery, absence of joint effusion, subjective feeling of knee stability, pain-free return to sporting movements, completion of a sport-specific rehabilitation, and at last allied team support. Conclusions: This study identified 4 main themes, including (1) objective findings, (2) informative feedback of the team members, (3) subjective findings, and (4) type of sport and time to surgery as having the most influence on RTS decision after ACLR. However, interviews showed that even among professional team physicians, the main criteria to RTS in these categories were inconsistent. A definitive set of conclusive guidelines could not be established and would be a fruitful and useful area for future research through further quantitative studies and international consensus meetings along the foundation of the presenting study. Level of Evidence: V, evidence-based practices, qualitative study.

Identifiers

PMID36312698
PMCPMC9596898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.