ArticleCureus2022
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in an Undergraduate Medical Program: A Study From Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of PBL combined with mini-CEX evaluation model in the clinical teaching of urological clinic teaching.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Effect of Mini-CEX as formative learning tool for clinical skills in undergraduate medical students in a private medical university in Karachi, Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Enhancing organizational health literacy through pediatric clinical training: Mini-CEX-based formative assessment in case-based learning for pediatric pneumonia-a perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinical competency in infectious disease training: a longitudinal study of Mini-CEX implementation for medical interns.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Application of flipped classroom teaching method based on ADDIE concept in clinical teaching for neurology residents.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In clinical settings, direct observation (DO) with feedback is an effective method to assess and improve learner performance. One tool used for DO is the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX). We conducted a study to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of Mini-CEX for medical students at Aga Khan University, Karachi. Methods Utilizing a purposive sampling technique, a total of 199 students in six core clerkships of Years 3 and 4 were selected for this study. Participating faculty underwent training workshops for use of Mini-CEX and feedback strategies. Each student was assessed twice by one faculty, using a modified version of the Mini-CEX, which assessed four domains of clinical skills: Data Gathering, Communication, Diagnosis/Differential, and Management Plan and Organization. Feedback was given after each encounter. Faculty and students also provided detailed feedback regarding the process of DO. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with categorical variables arranged as frequencies and percentages. The Chi-squared test was used for further statistical analyses, and a P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Effectiveness was assessed via a change in student performance between the first and second Mini-CEX, and feasibility was assessed via qualitative feedback. Results We obtained three sets of results: Mini-CEX forms (523), from which we included a total 350 evaluations for analysis, 216 from Year 3 and 134 from Year 4, and feedback on DO: student (70) and faculty (18). Year 3 students performed significantly better in all foci of the Mini-CEX between the first and second assessment (P ≤ 0.001), whereas in Year 4, significant improvement was limited to only two domains of the Mini-CEX [Communication of History/Physical Examination (P = 0.040) and Diagnosis/Differential and Management Plan (P < 0.001)]. Students (65.7%) and faculty (94.4%) felt this exercise improved their interaction. 83.3% faculty recommended its formal implementation compared to 27.1% of students, who reported challenges in implementation of the Mini-CEX such as time constraints, logistics, the subjectivity of assessment, and varying interest by faculty. Conclusion Direct observation using Mini-CEX is effective in improving the clinical and diagnostic skills of medical students and strengthens student-faculty interaction. While challenges exist in its implementation, the strategic placement of Mini-CEX may enhance its utility in measuring student competency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.