Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312591›Full record

ArticleGlobal ecology and conservation2022

COVID-19 impacts, opportunities and challenges for wildlife farms in Binh Duong and Ba Ria Vung Tau, Vietnam.

Thuy Thu Pham, Hong Thi Kim Tang, Nuong Thi Kieu Nguyen, Phuong Hai Dang, Anh Thi Van Nguyen, Anh Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hoa Ngoc My Tran, Long Tuan Hoang, Duyen Nhat Lam Tran, Quang Nhat Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global ecology and conservation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thuy Thu PhamCenter for International Forestry Research, Bogor 16115, Indonesia.
Hong Thi Kim TangNong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam.
Nuong Thi Kieu NguyenNong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam.
Phuong Hai DangNong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam.
Anh Thi Van NguyenUniversity of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam.
Anh Thi Thuy NguyenDiplomatic Academy of Vietnam, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam.
Hoa Ngoc My TranCenter for International Forestry Research, Bogor 16115, Indonesia.
Long Tuan HoangCenter for International Forestry Research, Bogor 16115, Indonesia.
Duyen Nhat Lam TranVietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam.
Quang Nhat NguyenNong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam.
Nong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City · VNCenter for International Forestry Research · IDVietnam National University, Hanoi · VNDiplomatic Academy of Vietnam · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wildlife trade is a major cause of species loss and can trigger disease transmission. While the COVID-19 pandemic sparked public interest in eliminating the wildlife trade, a better understanding is needed of the economic repercussions of COVID-19 on those who rely on wildlife farming for their livelihoods. Using the case studies of Ba Ria Vung Tau and Binh Duong provinces in Vietnam - a country seen as Asia's wildlife trade hotspot - this paper explores COVID-19's impacts on wildlife farms and their owners. Understanding these impacts is important, both in order to design appropriate interventions to support local people in mitigating COVID-19's impacts as well as to inform effective policymaking around wildlife conservation in Vietnam. In this study, we adopted mixed research methods (including a literature and policy review, stakeholder consultation with government agencies and NGOs engaged in designing and monitoring wildlife conservation policies, a wildlife farming household survey, and research validation workshop) to understand the status of Vietnamese wildlife farms, as well as the impacts of COVID-19, and any opportunities and challenges for wildlife conservation and management in Vietnam. Our paper shows that, across the two studied provinces, numbers of wildlife farms and farmed wildlife animals have both declined since the pandemic, with declining market demand and wildlife farm owners experiencing difficulties accessing markets due to travel restrictions. Although this affected wildlife-related income, this represented less than 30 % of families' overall income on average, and thus households were able to maintain their livelihoods through other sources. Most wildlife is raised as an additional food source for farming families and plays an important role in the diets of surveyed households. Findings also highlighted that most surveyed households' post-pandemic recovery strategies involved expanding their wildlife farms in scope and scale; these households perceived a stable domestic market and high prices for wildlife products in future. Our study found several opportunities for sustainable wildlife farming practices, including greater political commitment, an increasing number of wildlife conservation policies, and stronger law enforcement mechanisms. Challenges remain, however; including an unclear and inconsistent policy framework, the presence of an illegal market, and wildlife farm owners' limited knowledge and understanding of wildlife policies. Our paper also shows a lack of comprehensive data and understanding around actual wildlife transactions during the pandemic, leading to challenges in confirming whether COVID-19 had any real impact on wildlife trade. Further research is required to address this knowledge gap.

Indexed as

COVID-19 impactsVietnam wildlifeWildlife farmingWildlife policy

Identifiers

PMID36312591
PMCPMC9598250
OpenAlexW4307965751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.