ReviewRoyal Society open science2022
Distinctive diets of eutherian predators in Australia.
Review in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining new Buruli ulcer endemic areas in urban southeastern Australia using bacterial genomics-informed possum excreta surveys.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Phenotype response for the invasiveJournal of mammalogy · 2025Article
- Rabbit hemorrhagic disease: The devastating impact of a highly contagious virus on rabbit populations.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- The Role of Foxes in Transmitting Zoonotic Bacteria to Humans: A Scoping Review.Zoonoses and public health · 2025Article
- Activity May Not Reflect the Numbers: An Assessment of Capture Rate and Population Density of Dingoes (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Diverse human dimensions affect the management of public and animal health impacts of free-roaming dogs in Australia: a One Health solution.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- The ecological roles of the European rabbit in the Magellanic/Fuegian ecosystem of southernmost Chile.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diet of the Dingo in Subtropical Australian Forests: Are Small, Threatened Macropods at Risk?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Spatial and Temporal Movements of Free-Roaming Cats and Wildlife in Two Local Government Areas in Greater Sydney, Australia.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Distinctive diets of eutherian predators in Australia.Royal Society open science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction of the domestic cat and red fox has devastated Australian native fauna. We synthesized Australian diet analyses to identify traits of prey species in cat, fox and dingo diets, which prey were more frequent or distinctive to the diet of each predator, and quantified dietary overlap. Nearly half (45%) of all Australian terrestrial mammal, bird and reptile species occurred in the diets of one or more predators. Cat and dingo diets overlapped least (0.64 ± 0.27,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.