Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312565›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2022

Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications.

Serge P J M Horbach, Joeri K Tijdink, Lex Bouter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Serge P J M HorbachDanish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0406-6261
Joeri K TijdinkDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lex BouterDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transparency is increasingly becoming the new norm and modus operandi of the global research enterprise. In this mini-review, we summarize ongoing initiatives to increase transparency in science and funding in particular. Based on this, we make a plea for the next step in funders' compliance with the principles of Open Science, suggesting the adoption of

Indexed as

Open Scienceresearch fundingresponsible research practicestransparency

Identifiers

PMID36312565
PMCPMC9554511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.