Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312514›Full record

ArticleApplied ontology2022

Evaluating and Extending the Informed Consent Ontology for Representing Permissions from the Clinical Domain.

Elizabeth E Umberfield, Cooper Stansbury, Kathleen Ford, Yun Jiang, Sharon L R Kardia, Andrea K Thomer, Marcelline R Harris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied ontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrating a conceptual consent permission model from the informed consent ontology for software application execution.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth E UmberfieldIndiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Health Policy & Management; Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Cooper StansburyUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics; Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kathleen FordUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing.
Yun JiangUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Systems, Populations and Leadership; Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sharon L R KardiaUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Epidemiology; Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrea K ThomerUniversity of Michigan School of Information, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Marcelline R HarrisUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Systems, Populations and Leadership; Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USIndiana University Indianapolis

Funding

The Indiana Training Program in Public & Population Health InformaticsT15LM012502 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Brian E. Dixon, William F Fadel · 2017 to 2026
$4.7M
Metadata applications on informed content to facilitate biorepository data regulation and sharingU01HG009454 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009454NLM NIH HHS T15 LM012502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, revise, and extend the Informed Consent Ontology (ICO) for expressing clinical permissions, including reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. This study followed a formative evaluation design and used a bottom-up modeling approach. Data were collected from the literature on US federal regulations and a study of clinical consent forms. Eleven federal regulations and fifteen permission-sentences from clinical consent forms were iteratively modeled to identify entities and their relationships, followed by community reflection and negotiation based on a series of predetermined evaluation questions. ICO included fifty-two classes and twelve object properties necessary when modeling, demonstrating appropriateness of extending ICO for the clinical domain. Twenty-six additional classes were imported into ICO from other ontologies, and twelve new classes were recommended for development. This work addresses a critical gap in formally representing permissions clinical permissions, including reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data. It makes missing content available to the OBO Foundry, enabling use alongside other widely-adopted biomedical ontologies. ICO serves as a machine-interpretable and interoperable tool for responsible reuse of residual clinical biospecimens and health data at scale.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksEvaluation StudyInformaticsInformed ConsentKnowledge Bases

Identifiers

PMID36312514
PMCPMC9616177
OpenAlexW4206829736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.