ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Perithyroidal hemorrhage caused by hydrodissection during radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules: Two case reports.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications of ultrasound-guided thermal ablation of thyroid nodules and associated risk factors: an experience from 9667 cases.European radiology · 2025Article
- Development and preclinical evaluation of multifunctional hydrogel for precise thermal protection during thermal ablation.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHydrodissection is a widely used technique during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules. Although it could effectively avoid thermal injury to the surrounding critical structures and achieve complete treatment, routine operation of the remaining needle could cause perithyroidal hemorrhage. In this report, we present 2 cases of perithyroidal hemorrhage during RFA caused by a hydrodissection needle, which have not been reported before. CASE SUMMARY: A 21-year-old female and a 45-year-old male were admitted for RFA for benign thyroid nodules. Considering that their nodules were adjacent to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the needle used for hydrodissection was placed and remained between the dorsal capsule of the lateral lobe and the recurrent laryngeal nerve. During the procedure, active bleeding near the needle appeared on ultrasonography (US). Although moderate pressure was quickly applied to the neck for several minutes, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) still showed an active hemorrhage. A radiofrequency electrode was placed at the bleeding point under the guidance of CEUS to stop the bleeding, and the procedure was finally confirmed to be successful by CEUS, without other complications.
conclusionHydrodissection during RFA of benign thyroid nodules was associated with a risk of perithyroidal hemorrhage. The timely recognition of this acute hemorrhage could help in the timely control of the bleeding, and CEUS-guided ablation of the bleeding point could be useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.