Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312453›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry research international2022

Nutritional Health Perspective of Natto: A Critical Review.

Muhammad Afzaal, Farhan Saeed, Fakhar Islam, Huda Ateeq, Aasma Asghar, Yasir Abbas Shah, Chigozie E Ofoedu, James S Chacha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Production of Vitamin K2 Enriched Dairy Cream byFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Soybean seed coat properties as determinants of natto and sprout quality.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Probiotics and Fermented Foods in Human Nutrition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad AfzaalDepartment of Food Science, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9047-9075
Farhan SaeedDepartment of Food Science, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-4015
Fakhar IslamDepartment of Food Science, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-5924
Huda AteeqDepartment of Food Science, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9612-1031
Aasma AsgharDepartment of Home Economics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-1440
Yasir Abbas ShahDepartment of Food Science, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-459X
Chigozie E OfoeduDepartment of Food Science and Technology, School of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-5872
James S ChachaDepartment of Food Science and Agroprocessing, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3006, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-0458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natto, a traditional soy food fermented by

Identifiers

PMID36312453
PMCPMC9616652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.