Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312385›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Graphite Size Effect on Chemical Expansion and Graphene Oxide Properties.

Zineb Benzait, Levent Trabzon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zineb BenzaitNanoscience and Nanoengineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5329-6007
Levent TrabzonNanoscience and Nanoengineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 34469, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does larger graphite flake size always lead to larger and better graphene oxide (GO)? Is there an optimum size to balance between the large building blocks needed and the defects generated during oxidation? In this study, the effect of using four different graphite flake sources on the size, structure, and properties of GO and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was investigated. GO was mainly prepared by the enhanced synthesis method except for the smallest graphite size, which could not be expanded before oxidation. The effect of the flakes' lateral size and thickness on the expansion volume was also studied. Several characterization techniques were performed throughout this work, and their results provide evidence of how the graphite size changes not only the expansion volume of the chemically expanded graphite (CEG) as well as the final properties of GO or rGO but also the presence of organosulfate impurities, defects, wide size distribution, and the harsh oxidation reaction itself.

Identifiers

PMID36312385
PMCPMC9609075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.