ReviewKorean journal of women health nursing2020
Factors associated with the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.
Review in Korean journal of women health nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive screening in hereditary cancer: a randomized controlled trial to test cell-free DNA-based early detection in the CHARM consortium.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Trial
- Understanding risk perception and risk-reducing decision-making for surgery among individuals with a genetic predisposition to epithelial ovarian cancer.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Factors influencing uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy among unaffected Israeli BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Suboptimal Adherence to Hereditary Cancer Risk Management Guidelines: A Cohort Study of High-Risk Individuals in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- A retrospective analysis of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy performed in women diagnosed with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer at our institution.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of ovarian cancer preventive strategies for women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants: the role of surveillance.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Determinants of intention to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among high-risk women for breast and ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unmet needs after prevention: a model for managing premature surgical menopause post-risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- The impact of public insurance on RRSO for HBOC in Japan: a nationwide data study.Journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Uptake of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Gynaecologic Surveillance Among Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants Carriers.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer in women with an increased inherited risk: insights into an alternative strategy.Familial cancer · 2024Review
- Attitudes toward Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy among Young, Unmarried, Healthy Women in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), including the uptake rate and decision timing, among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Methods: We found 4,935 relevant studies using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on July 6, 2020. Two authors screened the articles and extracted data. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment of articles was conducted using the Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies tool. Results: Five types of factors were identified (demographic factors, clinical factors, family history of cancer, psychological factors, and objective cancer risk). The specific significant factors were older age, having child(ren), being a Conclusion: RRSO decisions are affected by demographic, clinical, and psychological factors, rather than objective cancer risk. Nonetheless, women seeking RRSO should be offered information about objective cancer risk. Even though decision-making for RRSO is a complex and multifaceted process, the psychosocial factors that may influence decisions have not been comprehensively examined, including family attitudes toward RRSO, cultural norms, social values, and health care providers' attitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.